"Why did the United States attack Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen.
Why are US operatives helping to destabilize Syria? And why is the US
government so intent on taking down Iran--in spite of the fact that Iran
has not attacked any country since 1798! And what's next, what are we
headed for? When you look at the current trajectory that we're headed
for it doesn't make any sense at all if you're basing it on what we're
taught in school. And it doesn't make any sense at all if you base your
world view on the propaganda that the mainstream media tries to pass off
as news. But it makes perfect sense once you know the real motives of
the powers that be. In order to understand those motives we first have
to take a look at history."
In 1945 the Breton Woods Agreement established the dollar as the world
reserve currency, which meant that international commodities were priced
in dollars. The agreement which gave the United States a distinct
financial advantage was made under the condition that those dollars
would remain redeemable for gold at a consistent rate of $35 dollars per
once. The United States promised not to print very much money but this
was on the honor-system, because the Federal Reserve refused to allow
any audits or supervision of its printing presses.
In the years leading up to 1970 expenditures in the Vietnam War made it
clear to many that the US was printing far more money than it had in
gold. And in response they began to ask for their gold back. This of
course set off a rapid decline in the value of the dollar. The situation
climaxed in 1971 when France attempted to withdraw its gold, and Nixon
refused. . ."
". . .This was obviously not a temporary suspension as he claimed, but
rather a permanent default. And for the rest of the world who would
entrust the United States with their gold it was outright THEFT. In 1973
President Nixon asked King Fayal of Saudi Arabia to accept only US
dollars as payment for oil and to invest any excess profits in US
Treasury Bonds, notes and doles. In return Nixon offered military
protection for Saudi oilfields. The same offer was extended to each of
the world's key oil producing countries, and by 1975 every member of
OPEC had agreed to only sell their oil in US dollars."
OPEC was begun by the Western Powers as a way to control the Arab
countries, and at the same time to tie the Western price increases that
actually were set by the West to the Arabs: so that while the west got
these increases the blame would be passed on directly to the arabs for
price gouging, while the west laughed all the way to the bank.
"The act of moving oil off of gold and tying it to foreign oil instantly
forced every importing country in the world to start maintaining a
constant supply of Federal Reserve Paper. And in order to get that paper
they would have their real physical goods sent to America. This was the
birth of the Petro Dollar.
Paper went out, everything that America needed came in, and the United
States got very, very rich as a result. This was the largest financial
con in recorded history!
The arms race and the cold war was a game of poker. Military
expenditures were the chips and the US had an endless supply of chips.
With the petro-dollar under its belt it was able to raise the stakes
higher and higher, outspending every other country on the planet: Until
eventually US military expenditures surpassed that of all other nations
in the world combined.
The Soviet Union never had a chance. The collapse of the Communist Block
in 1991 removed the last counterbalance to American military might. The
United States was now an undisputed Super-Power with NO-RIVAL. Many
hoped that this would mark the beginning of a new hope, a new era of
peace and stability: Unfortunately there were those in high places that
had other ideas. Within that same year the US invaded Iraq, in the first
Gulf War. And after crushing the Iraqi military and destroying their
infrastructure; including water purification to plants and hospitals:
Crippling sanctions were imposed which prevented that infrastructure
from being rebuilt. These sanctions which were imposed by Bush Sr. and
sustained throughout the entire Clinton administration lasted for over a
decade--and were estimated to have killed over 500,000 children. The
Clinton administration was fully aware of these figures.
On 60 minutes Madeline Albright was asked about that figure and "was
that figure worth it"? She said: "I think this is a very hard choice,
but we think the price (500,000 children) was worth it."
"Ms. Albright what exactly was it that was worth killing 500,000 kids
for! In November of 2000 Iraq began selling its oil exclusively in
Euros. This was a direct attack on the dollar, and on US financial
dominance; and it wasn't going to be tolerated! In response the
mainstream media began to build up a massive campaign claiming that Iraq
had "Weapons of Mass Destruction" and was planning to use them.
In 2003 the US invaded. And once again they had control of the country:
oil sales were immediately switched back to dollars. This is
particularly notable due to the fact that switching back to the dollar
meant that a 15 to 20 percent loss in revenue, (happened) due to the
Euro's higher value. It doesn't make any sense at all unless you took
the petro-dollar into account. . ."
". . .are we still going to war in Iraq and he said 'Oh its worse than
that--I just got this down from upstairs meaning the Secretary of
Defense, which I just got today, This is a memo that describes how we're
gong to take out seven countries in five years--starting with Iraq and
then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia Sudan and then finishing off with
Iran."
Let's take a look at the past decade, and see if you see a pattern. In
Libya Qaddafi was in the process of organizing a block of countries to
create a gold based currency called the Dinar, which they intended to
use to replace the dollar in that region. US and NATO led forces were
used to help destabilize and topple the Libyan government in 2011 and
after taking control of the region, US armed rebels executed Qaddafi in
cold blood, and immediately set up the Libyan Central Bank (a Rothschild
Bank).
Iran has been actively campaigning to pull oil sales off of the dollar
for some time now, and it has recently secured agreements to begin
trading in exchange for gold. In response the US government with
mainstream media assistance has been attempting to build international
support for military strikes on the pretext of preventing Iran from
building a nuclear weapon. In the meantime they established sanctions
which US Officials openly admit are aimed at causing a collapse of the
Iranian economy. (All of this is blatantly ILLEGAL)
Syria is Iran's closest ally and they are bound by mutual defense
agreements. The country is currently in the process of being
destabilized with covert assistance from NATO and though Russia and
China have warned the United States 'not to get involved' the White
House has made statements within the past month indicating they are
considering military intervention.
It should be clear that military intervention with Syria and Iran isn't
being considered it's a foregone conclusion; just as it was in Iraq and
Libya! The US is actively working to create the context to do what they
already have planned. The motive for these invasions and covert actions
becomes clear when we look at them in their full context and connect the
dots. Those who control the United States understand that even if a few
countries begin to sell their oil in other currency it will set off a
chain reaction and the dollar will collapse! They understand that there
is absolutely nothing else holding up the value of the dollar, at this
point, and so does the rest of the world.
But rather than accept the fact that the dollar is nearing the end of
its lifespan (2013 is the 100th anniversary of the US dollar), the
powers that be have made a powerful gambit and they have decided to use
the brute force of the US military to CRUSH every resistance from every
state in the middle east and Africa. That in itself would be bad enough
but what you need to understand is that this is not going to end with
Iran. China and Russia have stated publicly, and on no uncertain terms
they will NOT TOLERATE AN ATTACK ON IRAN OR SYRIA.
Iran is one of their key allies one of the last independent oil
producers in the region and they understand that if Iran falls then they
will have no way to escape the dollar without going to war. And yet the
United States is pushing forward in spite of the warnings. What we are
witnessing here is the trajectory that leads straight to the
UNTHINKABLE. It's a trajectory that was mapped out years ago in full
awareness of the human consequences.
But who was it that put us on this course? What kind of psychopath is
willing to intentionally put us on this course just to protect the value
of a paper currency? It obviously isn't the president; the decision to
invade Libya, Syria and Iran was made long before Obama had risen to the
national spotlight. Yet he's carrying out his duty just like the
puppets that had preceded him.
So who is it who pulls the strings? Often the best answers to questions
like this are found by asking another question. Qui Bono -- Who
Benefits! Obviously those who have the power to print the dollar out of
thin air are the ones who have the most to lose, if the dollar falls.
Since 1913 that power has been held by the Federal Reserve. The Federal
Reserve is a private entity owned by a conglomerate of the most powerful
banks in the world.
And the men who control those banks
are the ones who pull the strings.
To them this is just a game. Your life and those of those you love are
just pawns on their chess board. And like a spoiled four-year-old who
tips the board onto the floor when they start to lose, the powers that
be are willing to start World War Three to keep control of the
global-financial-system.
Remember that when these wars extend and accelerate. Remember when your
son or your neighbors son comes back home in a flag-draped coffin.
Remember that when they point the finger at the bogey-man:
Because the madmen who are running this show will take this as far as you allow them to.
So how much time do we have left? It's the wrong question! Asking how
much time we have left is a passive-posture: It's the attitude of a
prisoner who is waiting to be taken out to a ditch and to be shot in the
back of the head. What are our chances, can we change course? Also the
wrong question" the odds" don't matter any more. If you understand what
we are facing then you have a moral responsibility to do everything in
your power to alter the course that we're on -- regardless of the odds!
It's only when you stop basing your involvement on the chances of
success -- that SUCCESS actually becomes possible. To strip the
guilt-begotten power from the financial elites and to bring these
criminal cartels to justice will require nothing less than a revolution!
The government is not going to save us. The government is completely
infiltrated and corrupt to the core. Looking to them for a solution at
this point is utterly naive. There are three stages of revolution, and
they are sequential. Stage One is already under way. Stage One is the
ideological resistance. At this stage we have to actively work to wake
up about what is happening and the direction we are headed. All
revolutions resonate from a shift in the mindset of the population and
no other meaning is possible without it. Success in this stage of the
game can be measured by the contagion of ideas. When an idea reaches
critical mass it begins to spread on its own, it can seep into all
levels of society. In order to achieve that contagion we need more
people in this fight. We need more people speaking out, making videos,
writing articles getting this information onto the national and
international stage. And we especially need to reach the police and the
military.
Stage Two is civil disobedience also known as non-violent resistance. In
this stage you put your money where your mouth is: Or more accurately
you withhold your money and your obedience from the government and you
do everything within your power to bring the gears of the state to a
halt! Practice in mass--this method alone is often enough to bring a
regime to its knees--however if you fail at this stage, Stage Three is
inevitable.
Stage Three is direct physical resistance. Direct Physical Resistance is
the last resort, and it should be avoided and delayed as long as
possible: And it should only be invoked after all other options have
been thoroughly exhausted. There are those that talk tough and claim
that they will resist when the time comes, but what those will fail to
realize is that if you are INACTIVE during the first two stages and save
your efforts for the last resistance--then YOU will fail.
When the Nazi's were moving from door to door and dragging people out of
their homes in Germany that was the time to fight back physically: but
due to the lack of ideological resistance and the civil disobedience
leading up to that moment, even an armed uprising would likely have
failed at that point. An armed uprising can only succeed if the people
have established an attitude of ACTIVE RESISTANCE. And Active Resistance
is only possible AFTER their minds have broken free from the mainstream
propaganda.
You want to fight back? It's NOW OR NEVER!
You're NOT going to get another chance
And the stakes are FAR HIGHER
Than they were in Nazi Germany"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment