Apparently the FACT that Iraq had WMD,and is historically noted, it went over some clowns head. Sorry to challenge you beyond your level of acceptance of truth no matter how distasteful it is to your mean spirited political lie appetite.
%^$))(@#$
This deals with the subject of Weapons Of Mass Destruction. First off let's honestly define what they are=
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12476890
Biologic and chemical weapons of mass destruction.
Bozeman WP, Dilbero D, Schauben JL.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Shands Jacksonville, 655 West Eighth Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA. william.bozeman@jax.ufl.edu
Abstract
Weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) are capable of producing massive casualties and are typically grouped into nuclear, biologic, and "CHEMICAL WEAPONS". In the wake of the September 11th disasters, attention to terrorist groups and the potential for use of WMDs has increased. Biologic and chemical weapons are relatively accessible and inexpensive to develop, and are thought to be the most available to foreign states and subnational terrorist groups. This article reviews various biologic and chemical weapons, including emergency diagnosis and management of selected agents.
PMID: 12476890 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
When the devil in Iraq used his countries Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction to kill the Kurds in the North, Chemical WMDs were used and they belonged to IRAQ. For you public schoolers out there are you with me so far??? Iraq had WMSs, and they were used
prs
This deals with the subject of Weapons Of Mass Destruction. First off let's honestly define what they are=
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12476890
Biologic and chemical weapons of mass destruction.
Bozeman WP, Dilbero D, Schauben JL.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Shands Jacksonville, 655 West Eighth Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA. william.bozeman@jax.ufl.edu
Abstract
Weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) are capable of producing massive casualties and are typically grouped into nuclear, biologic, and "CHEMICAL WEAPONS". In the wake of the September 11th disasters, attention to terrorist groups and the potential for use of WMDs has increased. Biologic and chemical weapons are relatively accessible and inexpensive to develop, and are thought to be the most available to foreign states and subnational terrorist groups. This article reviews various biologic and chemical weapons, including emergency diagnosis and management of selected agents.
PMID: 12476890 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
When the devil in Iraq used his countries Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction to kill the Kurds in the North, Chemical WMDs were used and they belonged to IRAQ. For you public schoolers out there are you with me so far??? Iraq had WMSs, and they were used. The only issue I ever had with this created question from the left in a partisan lie to make a President look bad, is when they were present in IRAQ, and in what quantities, two questions that remain up for debate. But for anyone, partisan or not to say that there were no WMDs in Iraq is just plain MISINFORMED BY CHOICE .Here are a few, I'm sure reluctant witnesses to the facts established above.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Tell me one more time why Bill Clinton lost his liscence to practice law in Arkansas for a period of time, and was fined more than $50,000, if it was not for perjury before the Grand Jury?? Another one of their utopian lies, that the left cannot stand to admit to, who's the fool and who are the fooled??
Just for kicks, give me a pass on my spelling, I type faster than I should. If my post has you pissed off, then my spellin is just fine!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment